Ever wonder which part of a document was generated by A.I. and which part was generated by a human? Never get confused again, thanks to this new LLM font regulation idea!

Background:

Now that seemingly EVERY computer text input field is “A.I.-enhanced,” it can be somewhat difficult to remember which part of a document was generated by an AI, and which part has actually been reviewed by a human.

The Issue:

The classic response to this is “well just DON’T USE THE A.I. THEN!!” But it can be fairly useful to, say, start a document with something like “Write a letter complaining about the poor-quality copper that you received in a recent shipment.”

(The old-fashioned version of this would be to first look around for existing similar letters, and adapt one of those.)

So the problem is that a person might start a document with an AI prompt, start to revise it, and then lose track of which parts were human-generated and which parts were AI-generated.

Proposal:

It’s possible to solve this issue in several ways, but the easiest would be to actually have AI-generated text be produced in a completely different font, as shown in Figure 1:

Fig. 1: The “LCD clock display”-style font shown in green makes the AI-generated text quite obvious.

Alternatives:

One problem is that fonts are also easily changed accidentally: a user might just change the font used in their entire document and thereby accidentally lose the “which section was AI-generated” info.

This could be solved by using entirely different Unicode characters for AI-generated text. There are many options for this, ᔕᑌᑕᕼ ᗩᔕ TᕼIᔕ E᙭ᗩᗰᑭᒪE, 🅾🆁 🅼🅰🆈🅱🅴 🆃🅷🅸🆂 🅾🅽🅴. (This has the advantage of surviving any font / formatting changes.)

Or, perhaps slightly easier, we can just adopt a new convention worldwide: henceforth, humans can only type lower-case letters, and AI models can only produce upper-case letters

PROS: Finally, the bizarrely redundant set of upper/lower-case Latin letters can serve a useful purpose!

CONS: Deprecating upper-case letters for human use might be a bit controversial.

Originally published 2025-04-14.