Abstract:
The 2006 movie Idiocracy depicts an extremely stupid consumerist-focused future. One of the scenes shows a character watching a TV show on a television surrounded by an unbelievably large number of intrusive ads (Figure 1).
But is this an unbelievable fraction of screen real-estate to dedicate to ads?
Let’s find out!
Materials & Methods:
We will take screenshots of the front page of several newspaper front pages, and calculate the following:
- Ad content (red). I am also counting “this web site uses cookies” notifications here.
- News content (blue). This also includes images.
- “Uncounted” area (white / black). This includes blank space, navigational elements, and the name of the newspaper.
This isn’t a super scientific study, since the actual numbers will vary a lot depending on browser type (especially mobile vs desktop), window size, the random appearance of pop-up ads, etc.
Data:
Figures 2A through 2E show data points from some high-circulation news web sites.
Note that the “ad ratio” below discards everything that isn’t an ad or news (whitespace and newspaper titles don’t contribute to this number, which is [ads / (ads+news)] ).
Conclusion:
It turns out that the Idiocracy TV is still on the high end for ad content (Figure 3); a “realistic” newspaper is only around ~60% advertising, rather than 75%. So we haven’t quite achieved the far-future consumerist dystopia of this film!
PROS: There’s still room to cram up to 40% more ads onto most Internet news pages!
CONS: We must soberly realize that it is not physically possible to increase web site ads to more than ~2x their current area, due to space constraints. Unless early-2000s pop-up ads make a comeback!
You must be logged in to post a comment.