Background:
History, as it turns out, is both long and (generally) not well-recorded. We only have very fragmentary information about events that occurred more than a couple thousand years ago. For example, historians argue about some sort of gigantic invasion around the Mediterranean in ~1000 B.C. by the “Sea People” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Peoples), but the actual identity—or reality—of these diabolical aggressors is unknown.
Here are a few empires / groups who (as was customary in the Bronze Age) no doubt committed many objectionable actions in their conquests:
- The Babylonians
- The Sumerians
- The “Sea People”
But as a result of people forgetting who is who, there are no existing geopolitical grievances related to these groups (i.e., there is no currently-existing “Akkadians vs. Sea-People” ethnic rivalry).
Proposal:
Thanks to genetic testing, it may be possible to identify the ancient origins of people in the modern day, thus re-opening once-long-forgotten feuds (Figure 2). The process is as follows:
- 1. Obtain genetic samples from non-cursed mummies in ancient tombs in each civilization in question. For our example, we’ll use the ancient cities of “Sumer” and “Babylon.”
- 2. Now, for each citizen in the modern-day, we can see if their genome is slightly more similar to the Sumerian or to the Babylonian ancestor. For example, a modern day “Sumerian” might be a 99.997% genetic match to the Sumerian ancestor, but only a 99.996% match to the Babylonian ancestor.
- 3. Each modern day person is then assigned to be either “Sumerian Descendent” or “Babylonian Descendent,” and is given a pamphlet detailing the crimes that the other empire perpetrated on their own ancestors.
PROS: It’s often said that it is preferable to confront problems, rather than ignoring / forgetting them.
CONS: Might cause endless war.
You must be logged in to post a comment.